The fact that climate modelers have their head in the clouds is evidenced by the large trail of data here on earth that they are loath to discuss. Just like the four seasons, other regular and modulating planetary cycles are at work. And then there’s the main cycle of influence, the Sun.

Connecting all the dots that are out there is an enormous task. But, like anything else, you start at the beginning and see where it leads you. Now after centuries of written data from other continents, ice core sampling from both ends of the earth and a little diving and spelunking the same pattern emerges.

Much like our solar system’s numerous cycles and rotations that interact with or are controlled by cycles in the universe, our planet cycles through numerous short-term cycles that are actually part of one larger cycle that repeats itself every 1,500 years. Our planetary cycle is consistent with solar cycles that run in 11-year, hundreds of years and 1,500-year cycles.

Odd things happen in those cycles including reversals of the sun’s north and south poles, mild sunspot activity, busy sunspot activity and sometimes a century or so of no sunspot activity, which is scheduled to cycle through again in 2015. If accurately predicted, we are in for a severe, century-long cooling spell.

As a sidebar, earth will be experiencing a once every 25,000-year cycle in 2012 on Dec. 21 when we will be in perfect alignment with numerous planets, suns, etc. in the universe. This cycle has caused our North and South poles to change places before and it could happen again. Or we could just experience pole drift that is more pronounced than normal. (The poles do move. I recall we had to renumber the runways at the Patterson airport about 10 or 12 years ago when magnetic north shifted one degree. Runways are numbered based on their compass orientation to magnetic north so you have Runway 6 for 60 degrees and Runway 24 in the opposite direction for 240 degrees).

Seabed sediment studies by different scientists from different institutions extracted from nine different oceans show indisputable evidence of the 1,500-year cycle. Parallel findings come from lake sediments from all over the world, fossil pollen from all over the world and cave stalagmites from all over the world as well as tree ring studies.

Writes Dennis Avery of the Center for Global Food issues, "Are we dealing with a cycle? A cycle too moderate and long-term to be discerned by primitive peoples without thermometers or written records?"

"The answer was confirmed in 1983, by the retrieval of the world’s first long ice cores from the Greenland ice sheet. Willi Dansgaard of Denmark and Hans Oeschger of Switzerland were anxious to learn what the ice could tell us about the earth’s temperature history. They had learned that the oxygen isotopes in the ice layers revealed the air temperature when the ice was laid down, through the ratio of 0-18 "heavy isotopes" to 0-16 "light isotopes," which evaporate at different rates," he wrote.

"Dansgaard and Oeschger had expected to see the long 90,000-year Ice Ages in the ice layers, and they did. What they had not expected was a long, moderate 1,500-year climate cycle. The cycle was very regular during the Ice Ages, at 1,470 years, plus or minus 10 years. It is somewhat more erratic during the warm interglacial periods, but still dominated the earth’s temperatures over the past 12,000 years. The cycle is abrupt, which argues for an external source. Dansgaard and Oeschger suspected the sun, partly because that’s where most of our heat comes from, and partly because the "solar isotopes"—carbon 14 in trees and beryllium 10 in ice—showed the same cycles," he concludes.

Of course, the obvious question is since we’ve known this since 1983, why is all the current anthropogenic global warming hysteria tolerated. Because, of course, it may provide the means to an end for socialists dreams of ending the economy as we know it and putting us back to a time during the pre-industrial revolution where regardless of man’s progress we still worked from sunup to sundown and had no leisure time at all.

There is one final problem that the AGW modelers get tongue-tied over. CO2 concentrations are logarithmic, meaning that what little green house effect they may have, that effect is reduced logarithmically down to zero at a certain saturation point. Much like putting sugar in tea, at some point the tea can no longer absorb the sugar and its absorption is reduced to zero and has no further effect on the taste of the tea. That’s called supersaturation.

The maximum temperature point is well documented in the 1,500-year cycle where temperatures ramp up to a certain point but never exceed a constant in any of the cycles. Also well documented are the zero temperature fluctuation at the equator and four-degree Celsius increases at the poles. Equator zones experience more rainfall while points farther north may see 200-year droughts, all of which is part of the 1,500-year cycle we are just beginning to understand.

So, put the peddle to the metal since nothing about fossil fuel emissions has anything at all to do with climate change. We can prove that.